Cannes 2013: Aishwarya Rai, Go Home! Sabyasachi, Go Home!

Just when you thought it could not get worse, Aishwarya Rai’s wax statue from Madame Tussaud’s hit the red carpet at Cannes. Oh wait! The wax statue looks so much better and far less style challenged than whatever it was that haunted the red carpet before the 100 Years of Indian Cinema gala yesterday. It looks like a really distorted fax copy of someone who was once (ostensibly) the most beautiful woman in the world. Did Aishwarya Rai’s suitcase go missing at Cannes, forcing her to dress in the hotel’s curtains and grab Baby Aaradhya’s headband before dashing on to the red carpet? Because, surely, nobody in their right minds would actually step out in public looking like this?

aishwarya-rai-cannes-2013-2Even Aishwarya – who has a whole history of Cannes fashion disasters behind her – could hardly have believed that this 1980s-Air-India-hostess-meets-fading-Baroque-princess-meets-desi-Batwoman-meets-boarding-school-matron look was a good one? I mean, seriously… ? All that black velvet completely swamping her from head to toe? In summer? Complemented by totally tacky embroidery that actually has no design – just a lot of gold on black? And is that more (ghastly) embroidery or a (ghastly) necklace around what would have been her neck, if the all-enveloping drape of this lehenga-sari actually allowed her to have a neck? All that this embellishment and cut-to-the-jawline round-necked blouse does is put the focus squarely on her double chin. Did someone steal all the mirrors at Cannes, along with the Chopard jewels?

aishwarya-rai-cannes-2013-3And then there is the jewellery. And make up. Severe, scraped back updo and tiara/headband and dangly earrings and a high neck and blush placed extremely strategically to make her podgy cheeks seem even podgier. Why, Aishwarya? WHY? Overall she just looks far, far older than her years and like someone who is desperately trying to hold on to past glories, despite being well past her prime. Which is really just sad.

Well! That’s Aishwarya Rai for you. But what in the world is wrong with Sabyasachi? Is this the same designer who once set new style benchmarks for Indian women? Six years back, I actually chose my wedding date based on when the Sabyasachi sari I so desperately wanted to wear would be ready. Now, I want to burn all his clothes. Sabya, where is the anti-establishment vibe you channelled so well (being tacky and tasteless is not anti-establishment… it’s just… tacky and tasteless)? What about all the quirky details, which had us poring over a dress for hours? All those gorgeous ethnic revivals and sumptuous fabrics? What about those hauntingly beautiful colours? We trusted you to keep our heads high on national and international platforms. You have let us down. Badly. Very, very badly.

Going back to Aishwarya Rai, my first thought at seeing her in yesterday’s Elie Saab gown was: Thank God!  My second thought: There is something wrong when the best you can say about India’s leading brand ambassador is that she is not looking embarrassing. Or garish. Or like something out of a bad Bollywood nautanki (farcical theatre). Are we so used to mediocrity now that dull, drab and frumpy is what gets our sighs of relief?

aishwarya-rai-cannes-2013-6I don’t mind that she is still looking extra-wide 18 months after giving birth. I don’t even focus on the fact that her arms are so out of shape that this Elie Saab couture creation actually had to be modified to try and hide them. Or that her neck seems to have stretch marks and even the much-widened armhole does not stop the flab from squeezing through. This is her personal prerogative and if a mom wants to spend time taking care of her tot, rather than working out like crazy to fit into someone’s notion of an “ideal woman”, all the better for her!

My problem lies in the way Aishwarya Rai dresses to highlight – rather than tone down – every single of her flaws. The gown is stretched too tightly over her stomach, the embroidery concentrates on the widest part of her waist and the addition of a second panel under the skirt makes everything look super-heavy and unattractively bulky. And what’s with that cathedral train? Doesn’t anybody realise that it just forces the eye to move horizontally, thereby making her hips look so much wider? Taken together, it just makes her look 20 kgs heavier! Look at the original and tell me if it doesn’t look far prettier, floatier and visually lighter?

aishwarya-rai-cannes-2013-7Then there is the color. Black and brown? Really? With all the beautiful jewel-tones that Indian women carry off so well, was this really the best choice? I think it makes her look sallow and muddy. A fact that is not helped by the hair and makeup. It’s pretty obvious that the hair has been left down and flowy to frame her face and make it look less round. However, it further clutters up the neckline… this is one time an updo was definitely in order. And the act of placing a vivid highlighter on the roundest parts of Aishwarya’s cheeks defeats the purpose anyway!

I much preferred Aishwarya Rai in the Zac Posen skirt, Saint Laurent shirt, Armani belt and Casadei shoes that she wore for the media call earlier in the day. It’s not a show-stopping look but the mermaid skirt makes her frame look curvy rather than flabby, the belt is placed just high enough to create the illusion of a waist, the plunging neckline draws attention away from the jaw and the black-white contrast creates proportions. See, we don’t need Sabyasachi, after all!

aishwarya-rai-cannes-2013-8What do you think of Aishwarya Rai’s first three looks at Cannes? Freaky? Or fabulous? And do you think our Bollywood actresses should continue to cling on to Sabyasachi?


Cannes 2013: Sonam Kapoor’s Epic Fail on Day 2

Sigh! It was too good to last, wasn’t it? After giving us a smidgen of hope in yesterday’s Dolce & Gabbana princess gown, Sonam Kapoor brought Bollywood’s sartorial redemption to a screeching halt with the Shehla Khan lehenga-meets-widow’s-weeds-meets-Halloween-costume at the Chopard gala in Cannes today.

sonam-kapoor-cannes-2013-9Honestly, my first thought was that shit, she’s had a fashion mishap – her nipples are showing through. Fortunately, that’s not the case. It’s not her nips, just some strangely placed lace details.

Unfortunately, that’s the only sigh of relief you are going to get. Really Sonam, WHAT WERE YOU THINKING? That strangely shaped blouse and detachable sleeves, which completely flatten your chest and make your body look look like a wide rectangle, with not a hint of curves? That very, very, very, VERY ghastly lace design? The uncontrolled clutter? An off-white-and-dove-grey palette that makes you look like an 80-year-old matron? A gorgeous Chopard necklace that’s totally lost beneath all that gauze and froth? A Ferragamo clutch (brown… why?) that has absolutely no connect with the rest of your outfit? Hair that’s straight out of the ’50s?

Have you already forgotten the disaster of last year’s scary black lace gown from Alexander McQueen?

Or is the ageing Batwoman look really your personal aesthetic of choice?

sonam-kapoor-cannes-2013-8

 

Cannes 2013: It’s Vidya Balan’s Turn to Play Ring-a-Ring-a-Noses

Awwww… Vidya Balan is just sooooooo sweet. She could have simply stuck to the dull-drab-frumpy wardrobe choices of yesterday but then what would we have added to add to the discussion? So, she very graciously went the extra mile and brought a whole new set of interesting stuff from a flea market Cannes boutique for today’s outing.

vidya-balan-cannes-2013-8Which is why, along with the upholstery-material sari in an uninteresting shade of peach (I really want to get into Sabyasachi’s mind right now and figure out what’s going on there!), most unflatteringly designed blouse, severely scraped back hair that makes her look 20 years older, makeup that leaves her complexion looking muddy and the strange every-tiny-inch-shall-be-covered-up aesthetic, we now also have the pleasure of a completely out of place Maharashtrian nath (nose ring), necklaces that seem to have been made at home and multiple layers of completely mismatched jewellery.

Sigh! Vidya, you first need to take a deep breath and figure out what look you are aiming for at the Cannes Film Festival this year: Warrior princess a la Jhansi ki Rani? Dowager maharani? Something out of a Raja Ravi Varma painting? Matronly school mistress? An 18th century villager? Someone who is so resourceful they can create entire outfits with just the hotel bedspread and curtain beads? Taken independently and out of context, each one of these looks would be an awkward and inappropriate choice for this platform. Taken together – like you seem to have done – is traumatising.

vidya-balan-cannes-2013-5As for that nose ring… I beg all of Bollywood! Please, please, pretty please, lose it NOW. If you do want to/need to wear a nose ring to ease the pains of childbirth and menstrual cramps (which is their real purpose in Ayurveda), you can stick to a simple diamond pin. Like Sonam Kapoor’s nath yesterday, this one is just a plainly strange size: too big for formal wear and too small for a bridal look.

And the rest of that jewellery… in which dimension of thought did you visualize the red necklace working well with the strings of blue beads? Really? And the earrings? And the nath? Would it be too much to hope that you’ll just take the next flight and come back home? You’re breaking our hearts Vidya. Don’t do this… just… don’t.

PS: And just in parting, for everyone who is trying to channel royal splendour at Cannes (or otherwise), this is what one of our true royals looked like at the same festival a couple of years back. Kitschy designer costumes, cliched “earthy” makeup hues, ethnic nose rings and OTT-meets-tacky accessories don’t make an “Indian” woman. Elegance, a sense of what works well on you and being able to adapt to your environment while remaining true to your own self does.

sharmila-tagore-cannes

Sharmila Tagore at the Cannes Film Festival 2009

Sharmila Tagore at the Cannes Film Festival 2009

Sharmila Tagore at the Cannes Film Festival 2009

Cannes 2013: Sonam Shines in Dolce & Gabbana (Yay!)

After her disastrous outing in the sari/gown/jacket and scary makeup yesterday, Sonam Kapoor’s done a massive turnaround at Cannes. Today, the Bollywood star took to the red carpet for the Jeune & Jolie premiere in a strapless petal gown by Dolce & Gabbana, paired with a chic necklace by mom Sunita Kapoor.

sonam-kapoor-cannes-2013-5The gown is dramatic enough to take centre stage, without shouting out shrilly. Plus, Sonam looks comfortable wearing it, which shows through in much more confident body language. Though, just maybe it could have been a tad bit longer and actually swept the floor like a princess ball gown normally does. This ankle length seems a bit awkward at first look. And a tiny little part of me wants to say that she looks like a birthday cake… but that would be nitpicking. Let’s just count our blessings where we get them. It’s a gorgeous gown and if you can’t go slightly OTT at Cannes (slightly, not crazily!), where else can you pull it off?

sonam-kapoor-cannes-2013-6

Even the makeup is soft and understated – all pretty pinks and sophisticated nudes – while the glossy side-swept hair gives her a fairytale princess look. Sonam looks years younger than yesterday… yes, it’s definitely an improvement and so much more appealing.

Do you agree that this look suits her better?

Disaster at Cannes: Starring Amitabh, Vidya and Sonam

Dear Film Fraternity at Cannes,

First off, let me apologize. Here you are, trying to celebrate Indian Cinema and giving Bollywood a platform to show the world what it’s made of (and get some big bucks foreign funding in the process, I assume). But for some reason, it seems that all our Indian actors have missed the brief and mistaken the Cannes Film Festival for a kitschy, garish, a 2-year-old’s birthday party style costume drama. I assure you, their sartorial choices are not meant as an affront to your kind hospitality. Yes, I know it’s a sad day when the classiest person in a crowd of Bollywood superstars turns out to be Mallika Sherawat but there is logic at play here. Just bear with me and I will explain.

First up… Mr. Amitabh Bachchan

Let’s start with Mr. Amitabh Bachchan. Now, as you well know, Mr. Bachchan is India’s reigning superstar (no matter that he is 100 70 years old). Which is why Buz put him in The Great Gatsby, I presume – to pull in some of the famous Indian moneys. Incidentally, was that why Anupam Kher played an anchor role in Silver Linings Playbook? I am sensing a trend here.

amitabh-bachchan-cannes-2013-1But I digress. There is actually a whole lot of logic to Amit uncle’s shiny, sparkly tuxedo at the Cannes Opening Ceremony. You see, Amitabh Bachchan is a family man through-and-through. So, since daughter-in-law Aishwarya Rai Bachchan and son Abhishek Bachchan have both been unemployed forever now, the entire burden of running the household rests on him. Which is why, instead of being able to buy a brand new suit, Amit uncle had to economize and use one of Aish’s old saris to get a tuxedo stitched by the local darzi (tailor).

Added bonus: all the sparkle and glitter distracted from the fact that after paying the tailor’s fees (it can run into a couple of thousands, you know), the poor person did not have money left over for a proper dye job. And that’s why his hair is all a weird white-brown-orange combo. Not because he has absolutely zero sense of style. Nor because he basically is now an ancient relic and no amount of face job/hair job/clothes job can hide that fact. No, not at all. He is still a dashing, sprightly angry young man… don’t we have that kool polka dotted bow tie to prove that?

amitabh-bachchan-cannes-2013-OK, I know you are going to throw Amitabh Bachchan’s afternoon costume – the one he wore during The Great Gatsby photocall – in the face of my arguments. There is a logic for that as well. You see, Cannes is all about celebrating the 100 years of Indian cinema and Mr. Bachchan has been around for almost the length and breadth of this achievement. Which is why his clothes are a tribute to various eras of Bollywood. The jacket is 1920s Bomber jacket-meets-seersucker-stripes-meets-1960s jumpsuit-meets-1980s mechanic uniforms-meets-wannabe-disco-era. Yikes… I am exhausted simply writing this. Imagine the effort that must have gone into putting it all together. And then there are the white trousers and white shoes, last seen on Mithun Chakraborty and Jeetendra in the early 1990s. Don’t worry. Next time we will make him hold a placard (preferably in front of his old and wizened young and handsome face) explaining his sartorial savvy. And hope that Baby Aaradhya starts getting some roles soon, so that the poor man can once again afford some new clothes. And a stylist.

Welcome the dowager politician… Ms. Vidya Balan

vidya-balan-cannes-2013-3Moving onwards and downwards, I also apologize for Vidya Balan not breaking into a mujra (dance) after promising the same with every inch of her clothes-change for the Cannes Opening Ceremony. Trust me, she tried. But the ghosts of village-meets-tacky-courtesan-meets-1980s-Bollywood simply failed to channel through at the last moment. Plus, she needed to be tightly clutching that ghoonghat (veil) the entire time. After all, didn’t you know that the entire beauty of an Indian woman lies in her very modesty? I mean, c’mon… what if the tips of her fingers had actually shone through all the gauze and froth? What would her maths teacher from 2nd grade think!

And Vidya Balan is nothing if not consistent. Earlier on in the day, she wore another Sabyasachi sari. Dull and drab colors? Check. Mismatched and not-so-elegant jewellery? Check. Every inch of the body covered with relentless fabric? Check. Unforgiving silhouette that does nothing for her curves? Check. Super-severe hair à la 80-year-old politicians? Check. 1980s-inspired shoulders that make her look bulkier? Check. Absolutely and completely boring makeup that makes her look far, far older than her years? Check. It honestly takes great effort to make a Sabyasachi ensemble look dull and dowdy but Vidya Balan manages to do it with great aplomb. Kudos!

vidya-balan-cannes-2013-4

New Age… Something. In the form of Sonam Kapoor.

But then we come to girl-of-the-moment Sonam Kapoor and Vidya’s theatrics almost start seeming like a welcome relief. In her own head, Sonam Kapoor is still that massively overweight teenager who had to be swaddled in fabrics. Because why else would she spoil what is actually a pretty lace-and-gold sari (by Anamika Khanna) with that weird shrug-like long jacket? Yes, it’s stormy at Cannes but what else can explain why Sonam struck us with a train that completely kills the body lines?

sonam-kapoor-cannes-2013-1Also, take a look at the jacket itself: the badly fitted sleeves look just plain sloppy and make her arms seem  humungous. Then there is that whopping nathani (nose ring) from mommy Sunita Kapoor’s jewellery line. No! No! It’s not lack of fashion savvy. It’s just Sonam Kapoor’s tribute to 100 years of Indian cinema. Because, you see, every one of us Indians go around wearing that massive piece of metal in our nose. So what if I even refused to wear it at my wedding, opting for a some also-ethnic kundan earrings instead? I am just clearly not ‘Indian’ enough. And just in case you missed the point, Sonam’s gone out of the way to wear a nose ring that’s at least two sizes too big for her face. C’mon, please applaud the effort!

(Oh! And before I forget. If there are any Indians reading this, do you know of any shop that carries Sunita Kapoor’s jewellery? I have searched for it everywhere but can’t find any. Does her mom make jewellery only for Sonam?)

sonam-kapoor-cannes-2013-2Ah! And then there is the makeup. Severe foundation, concealer that’s one shade too light for her skin tone, eyeshadow overspill that highlights her dark circles, ’60s-Bollywood eyes, dark maroon lipstick, brown blush and lots and lots and lots and lots of shimmer everywhere. It’s like a makeup bag exploded on her face. Actually, maybe it did. Just as she was stepping out of the door. And the whole city of Cannes had run out of soap and cleansing wipes. Because nobody would voluntarily wear all this makeup and actually appear in front of other human beings, would they? Which also explains all the awkward and uncomfortable body language. You too would feel awkward and uncomfortable looking like this, right?

The one thing I actually liked was her hair – dressed up in a fluffy-but-neat bun placed low on her crown. Unfortunately, it fell into the too-little-too-late category with everything else happening on her person.

x16-1368680160-sonamcannes2.jpg.pagespeed.ic.5a4VffDYWwOh! And before I forget… please do NOT miss the every-tiny-millimetre-of-my-body-should-be-covered drama here as well. What is it with our Bollywood stars?

In short, by now I am sure that you feel we Indians embrace three signature looks – Fugly Fusion, Drab Dowager and Regressive Retro. But that’s not true. We have so much more to offer. Wait till you see Aishwarya Rai Bachchan, Ameesha Patel and Sherlyn Chopra. Then let’s talk again.

Rgds,

Anubha Charan – aka The Beauty Gypsy

Also read: The First Bollywood Crime Against Fashion at Cannes 2013